Friday, 7 November 2014


Aileen Wuornos



‘When I was a little girl, I always wanted to be a nun’

Aileen Wournos, born Aileen Carol Pittman, was an American woman who was born in Detroit, Michigan to a 14 year old mother and 19 year old father who was in fact a child molester, later imprisoned for the rape and kidnap of a 7 year old girl.  Though her parents married it was not too last with her father leaving before her birth.  Aileen never knew her father who eventually hanged himself at a prison in Michigan in 1971.  She was adopted by her grandparents in March 1961 along with her elder brother Keith a fact she did not discover until she was 11 years old.  A harsh upbringing followed with many beatings whose marks were observed by others while it was believed that she had a sexual relationship with her brother.  To say she had a troubled childhood is an extreme understatement and like her mother she gave birth to a child, boy, that was adopted in 1971.  Aileen went on to have tumultuous relationships with many men eventually leading to the murder of seven men in Florida.  Wournos is the first American woman to match the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI)’s profile of a serial killer. 

‘Sometimes society and circumstance throw up a female killer who, because of the nature of her crimes and, indeed, because she is a woman, stuns and sickens us all.  Lee Wuornos was that very rare specimen’

 

Tyria Jolene Moore



It was love beyond the imaginable.  Earthly.  Words cannot describe how I felt about Tyria.  I thought Tyria must be taken care of as she herself, had never been.  The only reason I hustled so hard all those years was to support her.  I did what I had to do to pay for the bills, because I didn’t have another choice.  II had warrants out for my arrest.  I loved her too much.’  Wuornos goes on to say that Moore sold her ‘down the river’ and hated her.    

Tyria Moore was a working class woman who met Aileen Wuornos in the Zodiac Bar of South Daytona in 1986.  The pair soon fell in love and began although the relationship, on Wuornos’s part, was mainly due to the development of a bond that was not just physical but rather loving and nurturing.  As the pair rented accommodation it was essential for the money to be paid on time to the landlord, however Wuornos and Moore struggled to pay the rent.  Was the desperation for money, which would help to satisfy Tyria Moore, her motive for committing the brutal crimes? The aforementioned information instigated Wuornos, even though the money for her was not great, to prostitute herself more frequently.  It is clear from the statements that Moore made to members of the criminal investigation that she was aware of the murders.  When questioned in a motel which didn’t fit the correct procedures and practices that should have been in place, regarding the sudden appearance of new vehicles and other various items, Tyria responded by stating ‘I told her I don’t want to hear about it’.  Following the questioning of Tyria Moore the decision was made to arrange for Wuornos be contacted in prison by Moore in order to ensure that substantial evidence such as a confession to the crimes could be made.  The phone calls were recorded, to enable them to be used as evidence in court, were damming for Aileen Wuornos as she said numerous incriminating statements during the phone calls such as ‘Ty, listen to me.  I don’t know what to say, but all I can say is self- defence… Don’t worry.  They’ll find out it was a solo person, and I’ll just tell them that, OK?’.Tyria Moore was not charged with any form of criminal offence which may have related to the fact that she was willing to betray Wuornos by testifying against her.  It also worth noting that Tryia Moore was offering to give her version of events to the film making industry, in order for a film to be produced, in exchange for money.  Did Moore really care for Wuornos? 

Richard Mallory



‘Of course I didn’t want to kill them in my heart, but I knew I had to’

Richard Mallory was the first victim of Aileen Wuornos.  Mallory was brutally murdered at the hands of Wuornos using a .22- calibre pistol in a secluded area of a forest.  Wuornos claimed that Mallory had raped her and she had in turn defended herself using the .22- calibre weapon that she possessed.  Richard Mallory was, although the court at the time of the trial would never know, was a violent man who often frequented strip clubs and used the services of prostitutes. Mallory’s financial records revealed that he was on the verge of bankruptcy and he had spent time in a mental institution on the charge of attempted rape.  The aforementioned information regarding Richard Mallory’s background, specifically the charge of attempted rape, make it plausible for the account that Wuornos made to be true.  Was Richard Mallory the trigger for the following six murders that would occur?

David Spears



‘I thought, what the hell you think you’re doing, dude, you know… you know I… I am going to kill you because you were trying to do whatever you could with me.  And I shot him through the… through the door and then he was kind of… went back and I went right through to the driver’s side and shot him again, and he fell back.  And, that’s all I remember on that one’

David Spears was the second victim of Aileen Wuornos.  Spears’s body, similarly to Mallory, was located in a secluded area with the fatal injuries caused by the discharge of a .22-calibre pistol.  In regards to physical appearance there was also a likeness to Richard Mallory and both men were middle aged.  David Spears in one source of reference is described as being ‘practical, predictable, honest and hard working’ which does not fit the description of the type of man that Wuornos would later go on to state in the trial into the crime.  It does not seem possible to imagine that David Spears, who was still ensuring that his ex-wife was financially secure, would be capable of viciously attacking a woman as Wuornos claimed.


Charles ‘Chuck’ Carskaddon



‘I shot him in the back seat and then I got out and kept shooting’

Charles ‘Chuck’ Carskaddon was the third victim of Aileen Wuornos.  Similarly to the previous victims he was also middle aged and described as beinga decent human being.  Carskaddon’s body was located in a secluded area.  Originally Wuornosstated, as with the case of Mallory and Spears, that she reacted in the manner that she did as she was acting in self defence although she did later alter the version of events to state that she committed cold blooded murder.  Carskaddon had been shot fatally using a .22-calibre pistol exactly nine times.  If Wuornos was in fact acting in self defence, why would she need to shoot Carskaddon the amount of times that she chose to do? 


Peter Siems



‘He tried to get the gun from me and stuff, we’re struggling with the gun and everything else and a couple of bullets shot up in the air and finally I ripped it away and I had the gun in my left hand and I put it back in my right hand and I shot him immediately’ 

Peter Siems was the fourth victim of Aileen Wuornos.  Although unlike the case of Mallory, Spears and Carskaddon the location of Siems’s body has never been established.  According to one source Peter Siemswas ‘deeply religious, easy-going and considered a real gentlemen’ which does not reflect the description that Wuornos gave of him to the court during her trial.  Peter Siems was sixty-five years of age at the time of his murder and this fact also makes it hard to believe that a man described by many as decent would be capable of viciously attacking a woman.

 

Eugene ‘Troy’ Burress



‘He physically attacked me… and he was… he laughed’

Eugene ‘Troy’ Burress was the fifth victim of Aileen Wuornos.  Burress was roughly the same age as Mallory, Spears and Carskaddon and his body was also located in a secluded area.  Burress was a hardworking individual and a respected member of the community.  Why would such as man attack a woman in such a way that would cause her to shoot him with her .22- calibre pistol twice. 

‘And I think I shot him right in the stomach or something’
 

Charles ‘Dick’ Humphreys



‘If I made $130, I’d take $30 and give her (Tyria Moore) the rest to pay the bills.  She always told me, ‘Get a motel with a swimming pool, because it’s so boring so boring here all day long’.  So I found a place with two swimming pools, a shuffleboard, a lounge, and a store with beer… the problem was I wasn’t supporting her as richly as she wanted.  She always wanted a brand-new car or a rented one.  She wanted clothes, she wanted an apartment with plush furniture.  ‘I’ve got to have my things,’ she said.  So materialistic.  I brought home about $300 every two weeks, but it wears you out, constantly talking to all those men, staying up.’

Charles ‘Dick’ Humphreys was the sixth victim of Aileen Wuornos.  He was fifty-six years of age at the time of his death, which is relatively close to the ages of the other victims of Wuornos.  Humphrey’s was a family man who was dedicated to his work.  Following a further investigation it was ruled that the cause of death was as a result of seven gunshot wounds to the body.  The murder weapon, responsible for the death of Mr Humphreys was identified as a .22- calibre pistol.


Walter Gino Antonio



‘When we were struggling with the gun and everything else, again, he fell to the ground and he started to run back… run away.  And I shot him in the back… right in the back.’

Walter Gino Antonio was the seventh victim of Aileen Wuornos.  Antonio was a hardworking individual who worked also as a police officer in the reserves.  Would a man of this disposition be capable of carrying out a vicious attack, the answer is it does not seem likely.  Following the recent discoveries of the victims, later established as being murdered by Aileen Wuornos, the police were identifying the links between the various crimes.  The final victim of Wuornos, Walter Gino Antonio, was discovered in a secluded area with fatal injuries sustained as a result of multiple gunshot wounds from a .22- calibre pistol.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Criminal Investigation

The stages of the investigation process


Initial response to reported crime

The initial response to reported crime in regards to the discovery of the vehicles and of Aileen Wuornos was primarily down to phone calls made to the police department.  However, in one of instance the vehicle of one of Wuornos’s victims was discovered by members of the police department whilst out on patrol.  The initial response to reported crime is a vital stage of the in any criminal investigation as it involves the official record being made that details the crime, it is this record that subsequently leads to a judgment taking place by the police to decide if a criminal offence has occurred.  If the police conclude that a criminal offence has taken place they will need to ascertain whether any other public service, such as the paramedic, will need to attend the scene of the crime in order to treat any injuries sustained to the individual/s.  The documentation/ records that detail the recording of the criminal offence would be the first logical process in the criminal investigation and so should be detailed and accurate as they will be referred to in court.  The initial response to reported crime is one of the more significant stages as it is the first process to occur in any criminal investigation; therefore it is essential that it is carried following the correct procedure. 

 

Preliminary and Follow-up Investigations

The preliminary investigation will involve members of the police department, such as the First Attending Officer (FAO), identifying if there is any particular individual who is thought to be involved in the crime and whether the evidence present at the scene of the crime is of a nature that suggests that further investigation and additional services are required.  The information regarding the scene of the crime will be relayed from the First Attending Officer (FAO) to higher ranking officers,working as part of the criminal investigation,regarding details such as; the severity of the injuries that the individuals involved in the crime have sustained if necessary, the location of the scene of the crime, any individuals who have witnessed the crime taking place and any individuals that have been apprehended.  The preliminary and follow-up investigations play an essential part in various forms of criminal investigation as they enable the decision to be made, based on evidence and the if there are any suspects, as to whether any further lines of enquiry are necessary.  For example in the case of Aileen Wuornos all victims were located in a secluded area and the evidence that the members of the police force discovered was enough to carry out further lines of enquiry such as establishing a parameter to carry a search for further forensic evidence or any other individuals who may be injured.  It was also necessary that the scene of the crime was protected from members of the general public and the media in order to protect any forensic evidence from contamination or destruction.  Following the information being relayed by the First Attending Officer (FAO) the various other services can then carry out the follow-up investigations.  For example, the forensic evidence gathered from the scene of the crime will be identified and gathered, by the Scene of Crime Officer (SOCO), and transported to the forensic laboratory for further analysis.  The detectives working on the criminal investigation will subsequently make enquiries regarding the progress of the forensic evidence analysis.  The preliminary and follow-up investigations are essential in the positive outcome of a criminal investigation as, if carried out following the correct procedures and practice; they can be used in court to assist in either the conviction or dismissal of any individual/s on charge for the crime.

 

The Investigation Plan

The investigation plan will be required to be carried out with efficiency to enable a positive outcome of the criminal investigation.  The investigative process will involve the establishment of the further enquires that need to take place in relation to the particular crime that has occurred.  The investigative plan is carried out, in logical order, following the preliminary and follow-up investigations as the stage focuses on deciding the solution to various questions such as what will be achieved as a result of further enquiries surrounding the criminal investigation taking place.  The investigative plan, in the case of the victims of Aileen Wuornos, was to carry out further lines of enquiry surrounding the discovery of each of the victims and vehicles that were located in secluded areas of Florida.  The purpose of the investigative plan would also be to ensure that the appropriate additional services with the knowledge regarding the severity of the crime.  The form of criminal offence that has occurred will reflect the priority, for example a crime that has involved a homicide would take priority over a crime involving a burglary.

 

Incident Room

The incident room will be used in a criminal investigation that requires the police, that specialise in asking the appropriate questions, to listen and respond appropriately and accordingly to statements that are made by any witnesses who ring the number that has been set up to call if you are a witness or have information relating to the crime.  The use of the incident room in a criminal investigation is an effective method that enables the collection and interpretation of the calls that are received.  The calls made to the incident room are recorded and may be used in the court as evidence.  Although an incident room was not required in the case regarding Aileen Wuornos they are effective in cases regarding crimes related to children as a high volume of calls are received by the police.

Investigating Leads

The investigation leads is a stage in the criminal investigation that involves a plan being devised that focuses on the progression of the analysis of the forensic evidence that has been collected from the scene of the crime.  It may be necessary as part of a particular criminal investigation to conduct a further investigation, in order to gather information, by asking members of the community if they have seen anything in relation to the crime that has taken place.  The process of investigating leads is vital to the positive outcome of a criminal investigation as it enables the collection and interpretation of evidence that can be used in court for either the prosecution or defence.  In the case of Aileen Wuornos there were numerous investigative leads that needed to be followed, such as the analysis of fingerprints identified on the beer cans located in the vehicles a victim that would need to be analysed in order to identify a match which would subsequently require the police to apprehend the suspect. 

 

Researching and Analysing Intelligence Systems

It is essential when researching and analysing intelligence systems that the correct resources are used in order to achieve a positive outcome.  The detectives working on the criminal investigation will use various research and analysis intelligence systems in order to establish the individual who is carrying out the criminal offence, what weapon was used in the crime, at what time approximately the crimes are taking place and the location of the crime.  The process of researching and analysing intelligence systems will also enable a pattern, if applicable, to be identified.  In the case of Aileen Wuornos this stage of the criminal investigation would have been essential as there were numerous victims and the use of the aforementioned systems would have enabled the link to be established.  The information acquired can subsequently be used to inform the members of the criminal investigation when necessary. 

 

Gathering and Analysing Facts

It is vital when gathering and analysing facts that the correct protocol is followed to ensure the validity of the evidence as it may be required to be used in court as evidence.  There are a variety of methods that can be used to gather and analyse facts such as witness statements and forensic evidence.  In the case of Aileen Wuornos a range of methods were used in order to gather and subsequently analyse facts regarding the criminal investigation, such as the identification and collection of forensic evidence from the crime scene by the Scene of Crime Officer (SOCO) that was transported to the laboratory for analysis by a forensic scientist.  The conclusions drawn from the analysis of the forensic evidence will then be documented/ recorded and used as evidence as part of the gathering and analysing facts process of the criminal investigation.

 

Identifying Patterns and links

The identification of patterns and links is essential in a criminal investigation as it enables further information to be gathered that subsequently helps to build a strong case, founded upon knowledge gained from the process of gathering and analysing facts also, to be built that can be presented to the court in order to achieve a positive outcome.  It makes logical sense for the identification of patterns and links stage in the criminal investigation to take place following the gathering and analysing facts stage as it enables the known information to be built upon.  In the case of Aileen Wuornos the pattern, although discovered at a late stage, enabled the police department to be aware of the fact that all of the victims were of a certain age and were all male. 

 

Process of Elimination

The process of elimination is vital to the criminal investigation as it enables the police to question any witnesses that have come forward further, identify the findings gathered as a result of analysis of the forensic evidence, establish what direction the criminal investigation is taking and also look at the findings of the criminal investigation as a whole.  In the case of Aileen Wuornos the various witnesses would have been questioned by the police and the results obtained from the forensic evidence would be analysed in order to identify the next stage of the criminal investigation that needs to take place.

 

Ethical Considerations; Use of Press, Media and Other CJS Agencies

The use of the press and media can either assist or hinder a criminal investigation as it can help to reassure the public and appeal for witnesses or the suspect to come forward but on the other hand it can present report false stories that affect the outcome of the investigation.  Following the arrest of Aileen Wournos the media intrusion in this case prior to its trial was ethically wrong.  Politics and movie deals that resulted in the re-election of a politician and the sacking of police offers impacted on the public’s perception of the case.

 

Report Writing and Presentation of Evidence in Court

The reports and presentations of evidence in court must be detailed, accurate and carried out using the correct procedures in order to achieve a positive outcome of the criminal investigation.  The court, during the trial, will be presented with numerous reports from various members of the criminal investigation process.  In the case of Aileen Wuornos the findings from the following members of the investigation would be required; the pathologist, medical examiner, Scene of Crime Officer (SOCO), forensic scientists, detectives, witnesses, police officers etc. 

Members, roles and responsibilities of an Investigation Team

 

Forensic Pathologist

It is the responsibility of the forensic pathologist to ascertain the circumstances surrounding an individual’s death.  The forensic pathologist should identify the following; the identity of the deceased, the type of injuries sustained by the deceased, at what time the injuries were inflicted, what caused the injuries and ultimately what was the main factor that led to the deceased’s death.  In certain cases it may not be compulsory to carry out an autopsy as the reason behind the death of an individual may obvious to the forensic pathologist.  An example of an autopsy not being required would be an individual passing away naturally because of a known medical condition.  The evidence gathered by the forensic pathologist will be officially documented/ recorded as it may be required for use in the court.  The forensic pathologist involved in the particular criminal offence will inform the detectives, working on the case, regarding the findings that they have obtained.  The forensic pathologist would not be required to attend a crime involving a mugging but they would be required to attend a scene where the circumstances of an individual’s death are unclear, such as a body being located in a canal.  The forensic pathologist would have the role and responsibility of identifying the main factor that led to the deceased’s death. 

Medical Examiner

It is the role of the medical examiner to identify an approximate time that the individual is said to have died.  The medical examiner will have the role and responsibility of using their in depth knowledge of the processes involved in decomposition to officially document/ record an approximate time.  The service of a medical examiner would only be required when the criminal investigation involved an individual who is deceased.  The medical examiner would be called to a scene involving a suspected homicide, for example, in order to identify an approximate time of death.  The results obtained will then be subsequently presented to the detectives working on the criminal investigation.  The medical examiner may also be called to court to verify their findings to the judge and jury. 

 

Forensic Anthropologist

It is the responsibility of the forensic anthropologist to attend the scene and state that the bone/s do in fact belong to a human skeleton.  The forensic anthropologist will also have the role and responsibility of using their knowledge regarding the study of bones to answer the following; do the bones belong to a male or a female, how old the deceased was, the ethnic origin of the deceased and finally the damage inflicted upon the bone/s.  The forensic anthropologist will be required, as a part of their role and responsibility, to document/ record their findings.  The forensic anthropologist would play a vital part in the criminal investigation regarding the identification and analysis of human bone/s and the results obtained would be reported to the detectives working on the case.  The service of a forensic anthropologist would only be required when an investigation involving the identification and analysis of bone/s is necessary.  Forensic anthropologists would, for example, be called to investigate the presumed human remains present in a mass grave.  The forensic anthropologist would use their knowledge to answer questions as stated above. 

 

Detective/s

It is the responsibility of the detective/s in a criminal investigation to attend the scene and liaise with other members of the investigation, such as the forensic scientists, in order to identify the further lines of enquiry that need to take place.  The detective/s will identify what motive there may have been, in the case of murder, and ascertain potential suspects.  The detective/s will have documentation/ records that give a detailed account of the stages of the investigation that are taking place as they will be required to provide evidence in court that establishes to the jury and judge how they have come to the conclusions that they have regarding the criminal investigation.  The use of detectives is required in criminal investigations as they specialise in identifying the motive for the criminal offence, suspects thought to be involved in the criminal offence and the further lines of enquiry that need to take place.  The aforementioned information would be applicable to a terrorist attack and the detectives would play a role, if necessary, in liaising with international police forces.   

 

Ballistics Expert

The role of the ballistics expert will be to carry out various forms of testing at the ballistics laboratory in order to be able to; identify the particular make of firearm that was used in an attack, match shell casings to a particular make of firearm, ascertain the space between the victim and the individual using the firearm and whether or not the injury that the victim has sustained has been the result of the firearm in question due to matching the striations on a bullet recovered from the scene and comparison tests with those test fired in the ballistics laboratory.  The ballistics expert may also be required to match the wound that the individual has sustained to a particular firearm.  The ballistics expert will use various forms of equipment that are an essential part of identifying the answers required regarding firearms in a criminal investigation, such as; the database or a comparison microscope.  The role and responsibility of the ballistics expert will be to identify the firearm make and model using various forms of testing in the ballistics laboratory and also document/ record their findings as they will be required for use in the court.  It is essential that the documentation/ recordings are accurate and detailed as they will be questioned by the members of the prosecution team in court if the case regards an attack on an individual using a firearm and the individual on charge denies that they were involved.  The service of a ballistics expert would only be required in a criminal investigation that involved the use of a firearm, therefore in a terrorist attack that involved the use of firearms the ballistics expert may be called to attend the scene.  The ballistics expert would have the role and responsibility of looking at the bullet holes found in the walls of a bank, for example. 

 

Forensic Entomologist

It is the responsibility of the forensic entomologist to identify an approximate time that the individual is said to have died by using their in depth knowledge regarding the study of insects.  The forensic entomologist will have the role and responsibility of attending the scene and identifying what insects are present and at what process the insects are at in regards to growth.  The forensic entomologist will also collect samples of the insects for further analysis at the forensic laboratory.  The forensic entomologist will be required, as part of their role and responsibility, to document/ record their findings.  The service of a forensic entomologist would only be required when the events that led to an individual’s death cannot be ascertained, such as in a criminal investigation involving a suspected homicide.  The forensic entomologist would report their findings to the detectives working on the criminal investigation in order for them to have an approximate time that the individual has died.  The information reported to the detectives is vital as it enables the alibi of suspects to be verified along with other forms of evidence. 

 

The Police

The responsibility of the police is vital to any form of criminal investigation as they are generally the first public service that attends the scene of a crime.  The police, in the case of attending a scene were a suspected homicide has taken place, would call for assistance for the victim if it was apparent that they were still alive. The police officer who has arrived at the scene would be referred to as the First Attending Officer (FAO) and it would be there role and responsibility to cordon the scene offin order to preserve any evidence and protect the body from the environment, if the crime has occurred in an outdoor environment.  The role and responsibility of the police would also be to identify if any witnesses to the crime are present and take a statement from them which includes their contact details, the First Attending Officer (FAO) would also be required to report the crime to the police department in order for the relevant members of the criminal investigation team, such as the detectives and forensic scientists, to be notified and attend the scene.  The First Attending Officer (FAO) also has the authority to apprehend any individuals who they presume to be involved in the crime.  The First Attending Officer (FAO) will be required to give a statement that may be used in court.The police would be the first stage of the criminal investigation process as they are in most cases the first public service to be called in the case of a criminal offence and they would potentially be called upon incourt to detail what they discovered upon arrival at the crime scene.  This links specifically to the First Attending Officer (FAO) as they may have detained an individual who was behaving suspiciously at the scene of the crime and they could be on trial, therefore they may have to verify to the jury that the individual on trial was the individual that they detained at the scene of the crime.  The police, regardless of the form of crime that has taken place, will have the role and responsibility to ensure that the individuals involved in the crime are safe and do not require any medical or other assistance.  The police will also have the responsibility of interviewing any witnesses to the crime, reporting the crime, apprehending any suspects located at the scene of the crime and calling for assistance when necessary.  In the case of a mugging there would be no requirement of services such as a forensic pathologist as there are no individuals that are deceased.  The police would acquire any CCTV footage showing the mugging taking place, witnesses would be asked to give a statement and the victim of the mugging would also give a statement that details a description of the attacker.  The police, following the collection of the victim’s details, would ensure that they are called in to the police station to identify any suspects that have been apprehended from a line up or through looking at pictures of the suspects.   

 

Scene of Crime Officer (SOCO)

It is the responsibility of the Scene of Crime Officer (SOCO) to identify any relevant forensic evidence present at the scene of a crime and also ensure that the scene of the crime is safe for the other members of the criminal investigation team to access.  The forensic evidence, once identified, must be photographed and recorded prior to its collection and transfer into the appropriate receptacle.  The Scene of Crime Officer (SOCO) is required, as part of their role and responsibility, to ensure that there is a chain of continuity and that all forensic evidence indentified and collected is done so in the correct manor wearing the full personal protective equipment.  The Scene of Crime officer will ensure that all documentation/ records are detailed and correct as they will be used in court, in the case of a murder trial, by both the prosecution and defence.  The Scene of Crime Officer (SOCO) may be called to attend court in order to give a detailed and accurate account of the procedures that took place at the scene of the crime when they were identifying and gathering the relevant forensic evidence.  The Scene of Crime Officer (SOCO) will liaise with the forensic scientists regarding the analysis and the findings gathered as a result of the analysis.  The Scene of Crime Officer (SOCO) will be required at a criminal investigation that involves a terrorist attack as the relevant evidence will need to be identified and collected in order for transportation to the forensic laboratory for further analysis.  The Scene of Crime Officer (SOCO) will need to work with the police and other departments to ensure that the scene is safe to access.   

 

Forensic Scientists

It is the responsibility of the forensic scientistsinvolved in a criminal investigation to analyse any forensic evidence gathered at the scene of a crime.  The forensic scientists must ensure, as part of their role and responsibility, that they maintain the chain of continuity and wear the appropriate items of personal protective equipment during the analysis of the forensic evidence.  The conclusions that they draw from the analysis of the forensic evidence will be required to be documented, in great detail, along with pictures to illustrate to the court their findings.  It is essential that any documentation/ records are detailed and accurate as they will be used in court, in the case of a murder trial, by both the prosecution and defence.  Forensic scientists are essential in most forms of criminal investigation as they enable any relevant forensic evidence to be gathered and analysed.  In a terrorist attack any fingerprints that are identified and gathered can be ran through a database and a match could potentially be identified.  The findings gathered from the analysis of the fingerprints would be officially documented/ recorded and shown to the detectives, working on the case, who would then locate and detain the individual if possible.  

 

Justice System

The American Justice System is based around the application of various criminal investigative processes. These are governed by the ‘U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights, state constitutions, the U.S. Code, State Codes, court decisions, federal rules of criminal procedure, and department and agency rules and regulations.  The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, for example, govern the procedure in all criminal proceedings in courts of the United States.’

The following are the stages of the criminal justice process that would have been applicable in the Aileen Wournos case:-

Investigation  -  The arrest of a suspect/s is based upon the evidence gathered from a criminal investigation.

Arrest  -  To make an arrest in the American justice system ‘probable cause’ is required in order to arrest and detain a suspect/s.

Prosecution  -  This is based on the district attorney’s decision that the evidence gathered supports the decision to prosecute the suspect/s.

Indictment  -  In this stage probable cause needs to be shown in order for a suspect/s to be indicted.

Arraignment  -  At this stage of the process the defendant/s will appear in court in order to enter a plea of either guilty or not guilty.

PretrialDetention(Bail Hearing)  -  This stage is when the defendant/s can apply for bail while awaiting trial subject to the defence and prosecution’s case.

Plea Bargaining  -  This stage of the process may involve the defendant/s admitting their crime with a plea of guilty in order to received a lesser charge or sentence.

Trial/Adjudication of guilt  -  This is when the prosecution and defence present their cases before a judge and jury and await their decision. Guilt is based on a case proved beyond a reasonable doubt.

Sentencing  -  If a guilty verdict is given the judge will then decide on the appropriate punishment for the crime the defendant/s has been convicted of and if a not guilty verdict is given the judge will release the defendant/s.

Appeals  -  These can be lodged by the defence and prosecution attorneys following the verdict given at a trial.

Punishment/rehabilitation  -  This is the final stage of this process and is governed by the local, state or the federal correctional authorities.  The convicted person/s will serve their sentence, be paroled or pardoned during this stage.  However in certain cases the final solution is the administration of the death penalty.

 


Key Members Of Each Process Of The Criminal Investigation

Richard Mallory

Detectives  -  Deputy John Bonnevier, County Deputy Sheriff John Bondi,  Detective James Malady and Investigator Charles James Lau

Medical Examiner  -  James Downing

Forensic Pathologist  -  Dr Arthur Botting

Forensic Scientist  -  Daniel Radcliffe

David Spears

Police  -  Attended the scene of the crime

Forensic Pathologist  -  Dr Janet Pillow

Charles ‘Chuck’ Carskaddon

Police  -  Trooper Rickey

Detectives  -  Marion County’s Deputy Lawing

Peter Siems

Detectives  -  Marion County’s Deputy Lawing

Eugene ‘Troy’ Burress

Detectives  -  Marion County’s Deputys

 

Charles ‘Dick’ Humphries

Police  -  Wildwood Police Department

Walter Gino Antonio

Police

Detectives